This split is broadly reflected elsewhere in the industry in available data from other competitions such as the BBC Writersroom, the Nicholls Fellowship and The Black List. Gender of applicantsįemale entrants made up approximately 30% of the first callout and this dropped to roughly 20% for the most recent callout. Great people, very supportive atmosphere. I think they could have avoided this by making the situations and world-believability king rather than the gags and asides to camera (although the ‘where did you go’ moments were clever).įor another comedy on BBC iPlayer which is still going strong and into its third season, may I humbly submit for your consideration the aptly titled Pamela Adlon-vehicle, Better Things.Īnyone looking to hone their comedic writing in London could do worse than to go to the London Comedy Writers Group. This is a similar trend I’ve noticed in much recent British comedy, particularly the BBC, for example in Fleabag.Īlthough Fleabag built up a loyal following, this was not reflected in the ratings (S2 E1 was 25% below the average for that time slot, according to Chortle) and the show ultimately ended after only two seasons. I noticed a number of comedy entrants which shared a similar habit of inserting a gag or one-liner too regularly. I go into some more detail about this in my article on the first event. You would not apply for a job using anything other than the potential employer’s standard process and so you should view your script entry the same way. If you do not follow the format rules, together with the codes and conventions, you really are shooting yourself in the foot.Ī script entry is not just a piece of art, it is also an application form. When this happens, you distract the reader and make their job harder. However, I wanted to add a few more thoughts on the trends I saw coming through: FormatĪgain, a surprising number of scripts, either partially, or completely, did not follow standard script format. I was pleased to read a lot of really promising scripts with a real diversity of style and approach. I also assessed the scripts as they came in and announced winners literally days after the deadline, rather than making writers wait around needlessly for months. At IMIS, we decided to build on the incredible spirit of the first “Out Loud” that culminated in a magical night that performed the winning scripts in a Table Read to an audience.įor the second “Out Loud”, we, again, offered it free to enter, free to attend, and did not place a condition on previous experience, because we recognise the barrier lack of funds can be for participation in the arts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |